Customer Success Lab
A Branching Simulation for Risk Recognition & Decision-Making
This project demonstrates my ability to analyze a workplace performance problem and translate it into an authentic, scenario-based learning experience that builds judgment and decision-making through realistic practice and consequences.
Skills Demonstrated
Performance gap and needs analysis
Action mapping and performance-focused design
Branching scenario design
Consequence-based learning and feedback
Designing realistic, data-driven decision practice
UX/UI design for simulated workplace environments
High-fidelity prototyping
AI-assisted custom interaction development
Rapid prototyping with HTML/CSS/JavaScript
Application of adult learning principles
Project Overview
This prototype is a hypothetical training solution designed to help new Customer Success Associates recognize emerging account risk while balancing customer needs with productivity. To simulate a realistic design process, I used ChatGPT as a simulated subject matter expert (SME) to explore the performance problem, validate workplace scenarios, and refine realistic customer behaviors and account data.
I then translated that analysis into action mapping, branching scenarios, consequence-based feedback, and a high-fidelity simulated work environment. As part of the prototype, I also used Claude Code for AI-assisted development.
The Problem
The Customer Success team was experiencing preventable customer churn. Newer Customer Success Associates were often addressing customer concerns successfully, but account risk was sometimes being recognized too late to intervene effectively.
The company needed to help newer CSAs identify potential churn risk earlier, before customers reached the point of cancellation.
The Gap & Need
New Customer Success Associates were able to resolve immediate customer issues, but they did not always recognize when an interaction could signal a larger account risk.
They needed practice with:
Recognizing when deeper investigation is warranted
Identifying meaningful patterns across account data
Deciding when to close, follow up, or escalate
Balancing account health with productivity and time away from the customer queue
The challenge was not knowing the warning signs. It was determining when those signs mattered and what to do next.
The Solution
I designed a scenario-based simulation that gives new CSAs realistic practice identifying and responding to potential account risk.
Learners:
Respond to realistic customer interactions
Decide when deeper investigation is necessary
Explore account data in a simulated customer management system
Identify patterns across multiple sources of information
Choose whether to close, follow up, or escalate
Experience realistic consequences based on both account health and productivity
The goal was to build judgment through practice, rather than simply teach learners a list of churn warning signs.
Key Features
Four realistic customer scenarios with increasing complexity
Branching decisions based on learner choices
Simulated customer management system for account investigation
Data-driven decision making across usage, meetings, support, and account history
Realistic workplace consequences instead of traditional correct/incorrect feedback
Productivity trade-offs through simulated customer queue wait times
Evidence-based escalation to a senior CSA
Optional job aids available during decision making
Interactive custom prototype developed with AI-assisted coding
Replayable scenarios that allow learners to explore different outcomes
Explore the Prototype
This project is currently in the prototyping stage.
Explore selected components below to see how the full learning experience is designed to function.
Interactive CMS Prototype
High-Fideidy Canva Design
Navigate a simulated customer account and investigate information across multiple data sources.
View the scenario screens, decision points, workplace interface, and consequence system designed for the full branching experience.
This project followed a structured instructional design process, drawing on both the ADDIE framework and SAM.